{"id":90943,"date":"2025-11-12T17:05:28","date_gmt":"2025-11-12T14:05:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/forklog.com\/en\/?p=90943"},"modified":"2025-11-12T17:10:22","modified_gmt":"2025-11-12T14:10:22","slug":"ai-music-indistinguishable-from-human-creations-say-listeners","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/u1f987.com\/en\/ai-music-indistinguishable-from-human-creations-say-listeners\/","title":{"rendered":"AI Music Indistinguishable from Human Creations, Say Listeners"},"content":{"rendered":"

According to a Deezer\u2013Ipsos study reported by Reuters<\/a>, 97% of listeners cannot differentiate between songs created by artificial intelligence and those composed by humans.<\/p>\n

The survey, conducted among 9,000 individuals from eight countries including the US, UK, and France, revealed that 73% of respondents desire transparency regarding the use of AI in music creation.<\/p>\n

Additionally, 71% expressed surprise at their inability to distinguish between human and synthetic tracks.<\/p>\n

Music streaming service Deezer, with 9.7 million paying users, reported over 50,000 AI-generated tracks uploaded daily\u2014about a third of the total. In April, this figure was 18%.<\/p>\n

The platform has implemented labeling and excluded AI tracks from editorial playlists and algorithmic recommendations.<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cWe firmly believe that creativity is born from humans and should be protected,\u201d said Deezer CEO Alexis Lantier.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

He noted the challenges in implementing a differentiated payment structure for AI-created music. Deezer has also begun excluding fake streams from royalty calculations.<\/p>\n

Lawsuit Against OpenAI<\/h2>\n

In early 2025, a scandal emerged involving the group The Velvet Sundown, which attracted millions of listeners on Spotify. The synthetic origin of its music was uncovered.<\/p>\n

Another issue is the training of neural networks on songs without obtaining the necessary licenses.<\/p>\n

The Munich Regional Court ruled<\/a> that the startup OpenAI violated German copyright laws by training its models on the lyrics of Herbert Gr\u00f6nemeyer and other artists, including hits like Maenner and Bochum.<\/p>\n

The case was initiated by the German copyright protection society GEMA, which includes composers, poets, and publishers.<\/p>\n

Presiding Judge Elke Schwager ordered OpenAI to compensate for the use of copyrighted materials. The amount was not disclosed.<\/p>\n

The developer of ChatGPT claims that language models do not store or copy specific training data. They reflect what they have learned from all the information received.<\/p>\n

OpenAI argues that since the result is generated after a prompt is entered, users are responsible for it.<\/p>\n

However, the judge believes that memorization in LLM<\/span> and subsequent reproduction of song lyrics constitutes a copyright violation.<\/p>\n

Precedent<\/h2>\n

The court’s verdict may set a precedent in Europe regarding the use of copyrighted materials for training AI models.<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cThe internet is not a self-service store but a collection of human creative achievements. These are not free templates. Today we have set a precedent that protects and clarifies authors’ rights: even operators of AI tools like ChatGPT must comply with copyright law,\u201d stated GEMA CEO Tobias Holzm\u00fcller.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

An OpenAI representative noted that the company disagrees with the decision and will consider further steps.<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cThe ruling concerns a limited set of song lyrics and does not affect the millions of people, companies, and developers in Germany who use our technology daily,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

In September, Suno introduced<\/a> the \u201cworld’s first\u201d generative DAW\u2014Suno Studio, which \u201cradically reimagines the music creation process.\u201d<\/p>\n