{"id":26921,"date":"2020-08-06T10:30:53","date_gmt":"2020-08-06T07:30:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/forklog.com\/en\/?p=26921"},"modified":"2025-08-26T17:33:23","modified_gmt":"2025-08-26T14:33:23","slug":"ethereum-classic-network-hit-by-second-attack-in-a-week","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/u1f987.com\/en\/ethereum-classic-network-hit-by-second-attack-in-a-week\/","title":{"rendered":"Ethereum Classic network hit by second attack in a week"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Ethereum Classic network logged its second 51% attack in a week. Bitquery analysts <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.bitquery.io\/attacker-stole-807k-etc-in-ethereum-classic-51-attack\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">concluded<\/a> that losses from the previous attack amounted to 807,260 ETC (~$5.6 million).<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>In early August, <a href=\"https:\/\/u1f987.com\/en\/news\/ethereum-classic-developers-report-network-outage\">emerged<\/a> reports that at block 10,904,146 the Ethereum Classic network underwent a reorganization. Its depth was 3,693 blocks. At that time, developers suggested the incident could be a double-spend attack.<\/p>\n<p>To carry out the attack, the attacker rented external computing power to the value of 17.5 BTC ($192,000). Before that, he moved 807,260 ETC ($5.6 million) to several wallets, allegedly from an exchange address.<\/p>\n<p>He then began transferring the cryptocurrency between his wallets, including it in blocks mined by himself. At that time, tracing the hacker&#8217;s actions was impossible, as he kept the transactions only in his own version of the chain and did not publish them on the blockchain.<\/p>\n<p>Moving the mined ETC to an exchange, the attacker converted them into other assets and published his transactions on the blockchain, triggering the chain&#8217;s reorganization.<\/p>\n<p>Analysts point to a possible link between the wallet used in the attack and the OKEx exchange. Viktor Fan, CEO of analytics firm Anchain.ai, arrived at the same conclusion.<\/p>\n<p>The second attack was reported by Ethermine mining-pool operator <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/etherchain_org\/status\/1291216063628226562\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Bitfly<\/a> and the <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/binance\/status\/1291225022866944000\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Binance<\/a> exchange. The reorganization, deeper than 4,000 blocks, occurred at block 10,935,622, prompting companies to freeze ETC deposits and withdrawals. The losses and other details remain unknown at present.<\/p>\n<p>Earlier, another 51% attack on the ETC network took place in July last year. The damage was estimated at $460,000. Later the hacker returned $100,000 of the funds stolen during the attack to Gate.io.<\/p>\n<p>Subscribe to ForkLog news on <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/forklog\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">Facebook<\/a>!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ethereum Classic has recorded its second 51% attack in a week. Bitquery analysts concluded that the damage from the previous attack was 807,260 ETC (~$5.6 million).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":26922,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"select":"1","news_style_id":"","cryptorium_level":"","_short_excerpt_text":"","creation_source":"","_metatest_mainpost_news_update":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[1395,1154,476],"class_list":["post-26921","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news-and-analysis","tag-51-percent-attack","tag-crimes","tag-ethereum-classic"],"aioseo_notices":[],"amp_enabled":true,"views":"26","promo_type":"1","layout_type":"","short_excerpt":"","is_update":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/u1f987.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26921","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/u1f987.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/u1f987.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/u1f987.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/u1f987.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26921"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/u1f987.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26921\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":26923,"href":"https:\/\/u1f987.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26921\/revisions\/26923"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/u1f987.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/26922"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/u1f987.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26921"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/u1f987.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=26921"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/u1f987.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=26921"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}