{"id":12854,"date":"2024-04-23T17:48:09","date_gmt":"2024-04-23T14:48:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/forklog.com\/en\/us-blockchain-associations-challenge-secs-regulatory-approach\/"},"modified":"2024-04-23T17:48:09","modified_gmt":"2024-04-23T14:48:09","slug":"us-blockchain-associations-challenge-secs-regulatory-approach","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/u1f987.com\/en\/us-blockchain-associations-challenge-secs-regulatory-approach\/","title":{"rendered":"US Blockchain Associations Challenge SEC&#8217;s Regulatory Approach"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Blockchain Association (BA) and the Texas Crypto Freedom Alliance (CFAT) have <a href=\"https:\/\/theblockchainassociation.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/CFAT-BA-v.-SEC.pdf\">filed a complaint<\/a> against the <span data-descr=\"U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission\" class=\"old_tooltip\">SEC<\/span>, accusing it of &#8220;capricious rulemaking&#8221; and &#8220;erroneous attacks&#8221; on the digital asset industry.<\/p>\n<p>The organizations seek to overturn the &#8220;Dealer Rule&#8221; due to various violations of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) by the agency, which &#8220;prevent industry participants from operating under clearly defined rules.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>BA and CFAT argue that the regulator violated APA norms by unlawfully expanding the interpretation of the term &#8220;dealer&#8221;:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>&#8220;The unlawful radical expansion of the definition has nothing to do with the long-established meaning of the term and suggests an approach capable of causing irreparable harm to tens of millions of Americans and businesses involved in digital asset trading.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>In February, the Commission <a href=\"https:\/\/u1f987.com\/en\/news\/sec-establishes-oversight-rules-for-defi-dealers\">approved<\/a> rules for overseeing &#8220;dealers,&#8221; extending its jurisdiction to include more financial operations, including those involving cryptocurrencies. Under the new provisions, market participants managing and owning assets exceeding $50 million are required to register with the agency.<\/p>\n<p>The lawsuit states that the SEC refused to &#8220;substantively&#8221; respond to industry representatives&#8217; questions about the application of the expanded definition in the crypto industry.<\/p>\n<p>According to the plaintiffs, the term now applies a vague and much broader standard, attracting participants who &#8220;in no way resemble a dealer&#8221; in the traditional sense.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>&#8220;The &#8216;Dealer Rule&#8217; advances the SEC&#8217;s campaign against digital assets and unlawfully redefines the boundaries of its statutory authority granted by Congress. Such a provision could potentially push American companies offshore and instill fear among American innovators,&#8221; emphasized BA head Kristin Smith.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Previously, analysts at investment bank Berenberg suggested that the next &#8220;victims&#8221; of the Commission could be stablecoins and the decentralized finance sector.<\/p>\n<p>In September 2023, the head of the regulator&#8217;s enforcement division, David Hirsch, stated that the agency is examining certain centralized exchanges and DeFi protocols for legal violations.<\/p>\n<p>In April 2024, the largest <span data-descr=\"decentralized exchange\" class=\"old_tooltip\">DEX<\/span> Uniswap received a warning from the SEC about a potential lawsuit.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Blockchain Association (BA) and the Texas Crypto Freedom Alliance (CFAT) have filed a complaint against the SEC, accusing it of &#8220;capricious rulemaking&#8221; and &#8220;erroneous attacks&#8221; on the digital asset industry. The organizations seek to overturn the &#8220;Dealer Rule&#8221; due to various violations of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) by the agency, which &#8220;prevent industry [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":12853,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"select":"","news_style_id":"","cryptorium_level":"","_short_excerpt_text":"","creation_source":"","_metatest_mainpost_news_update":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[1162,36,128,26],"class_list":["post-12854","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news-and-analysis","tag-court-cases","tag-regulation","tag-sec","tag-usa"],"aioseo_notices":[],"amp_enabled":true,"views":"33","promo_type":"","layout_type":"","short_excerpt":"","is_update":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/u1f987.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12854","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/u1f987.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/u1f987.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/u1f987.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/u1f987.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12854"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/u1f987.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12854\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/u1f987.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/12853"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/u1f987.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12854"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/u1f987.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12854"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/u1f987.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12854"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}